Volatility

October 19, 2020

Why the Covid Exploitation and Lunacy

<

 
 
Why does the government-media continue with the terror-lockdown assault which uses covid as a pretext? We can rule out ahead of time any rational public health goal. The universal pro-poison policy of all Western and West-aping governments in agriculture, industry, consumer goods and every other part of the economic system; the universal relentless poisoning of the air, water, soil, general environment, our food, our bodies; the universal hostility toward seeking to reinvigorate our immune systems outdoors, in the woods; the imposition of health-destroying bad diet, bad shelter, all the immune-destroying, virus-empowering stresses of our increasingly constrained economic and political existence; the universal hostility of the US political and media class to Medicare for All and the intent of countries that do still have universal health care to gut these systems: All these prove the fact. The governments and media are hostile to the public health. They want to render the people as sick as possible, sure as the pharoahs relied on the conditions of corvee and slave labor to keep the peasants weak with schistosomiasis. Nothing has changed to this day.
 
And even if anyone ever had a public health motivation and initially panicked “in good faith”, it quickly became clear that the panic never was warranted. It was clear from early on that the right policy was to shield the vulnerable where concentrated in hospitals and nursing homes while the rest of society continued as usual. Imposing the lockdowns was the direct upside-down opposite of what should have been done from any rational point of view. Lockdowns have had nothing but destructive effects, including upon public health.
 
The pro-lockdown covidiots with their fake officially manipulated and grossly inflated statistics about alleged “Covid deaths” never cared about the much greater number that will die from being refused non-covid-related care such as cancer screenings, heart check-ups, scheduled surgeries; from deteriorating health on account of not being able to afford good food, good shelter; from deteriorating health on account of the great stress of aggravated economic precarity and the terror propaganda itself; from lockdown-driven increased depression, suicide, homicide. Meanwhile the one thing their lockdowns systematically failed to do was protect the concentrated vulnerable. This failure, and the subsequent death tolls in the nursing homes and similar facilities, was so complete that it looks like a deliberate euthanasia campaign. This is confirmed by the many governors and other officials in the US, UK and elsewhere that made it systematic policy to introduce patients known to be infected into what were supposed to be these sequestered facilities. That brings our string suspicion of mass euthanasia very near the point of smoking gun proof. That renders all the deaths in these insitutions as well the result, not of “covid” itself but of the lockdowns and lockdown-ancillary policy.
 
And then we have the fact, admitted even by the official numbers, that after a brief spike of excess deaths last spring the rate of excess mortality quickly subsided and flatlined. Since summer the overall death rate has been similar to all recent years. The “pandemic”, whatever it ever was in the first place, indisputably is over and has been for months.
 
As for that spike, no doubt almost all of the excess who died were those aged who were covid-euthanized (average age of an official covid mortal victim, over 80, greater than the average lifespan in general). To say again, such covid deaths are not from any “pandemic” which is “out there”, but rather from the deliberate systematic infiltration of a pathogen into otherwise sequestered facilities with the goal of sowing death among the inmates. This crime against humanity is the shared crime of all policy-makers and all who still support the lockdowns.
 
 
So why is there still a media terror campaign? Why is there still this intense social pressure campaign, in many regions enforced by lawless escalated police state aggression, for ritualistic face diapers and anti-social hex distancing? Why is there still this schizophrenic-inducing double-bind program of alternately relaxing the lockdowns and constricting again, relaxing and constricting?
 
We can rule out panic and hysteria. Although many including officials may have been part of the original panic stampede, many months have passed and the panic no longer exists. By now any government imposing any measure, any media engaged in fear-mongering and touting any measure, any person believing in the propaganda and willingly complying with the social control measures, all these are making a sober, deliberate choice to continue the fascist assault, to continue to astroturf the mass Covid Death Cult, to continue to choose to be a member of this cult.
 
No doubt there’s still a strong Cover-Your-Ass motivation. All politicians today are moral cowards and voters consistently reward moral cowardice since they themselves are such cowards. That’s what mass electoralism is by now: A mass of cowards selecting the most cowardly to lead them backward to the womb. Therefore no official, elected or not (witness how spectacularly Ferguson and Fauci have failed upward their entire careers), is likely to be penalized for doing too much, being too draconian on account of hysteria. But if you rationally observe the evidence and calculate measured policy based upon the evidence, any real or alleged “mistake” or allegation of “doing too little” may sink you.
 
So the political risk runs one way, against rationality, against science, against evidence-based policy, and in favor of hysteria and the tyrannical malevolence that seeks to exploit the great fear. This is a pathology inherent to late-modern electoralism.
 
This dovetails perfectly with the fundamental tenet of Dominion-technocrat ideology that given any opportunity, radical state-technological intervention should be done purely for its own sake and without regard for any risk or harm. This is true in general even where no one seriously alleges there’s a “problem” that needs to be “solved”, let alone where a problem does exist or fraudulently can be alleged to exist. Those who adhere to or follow this ideology not only are willing to commit any techno- and/or police state intervention toward the goal of propping up the economy of worthless destructive junk, their attitude is that radical intervention always should be ongoing for any reason or no reason at all. This is a core insanity of the economic civilization. The one thing never on the table is to desist from your original action which is causing the problem or alleged problem in the first place.
 
Thus no one in government or media, no one from the political class, none from the intellectual set, no one that follows any of these, ever for a moment considered the alternatives. For the elites and their tools, there was no alternative to perpetrating the terror-lockdown offensive; for the people, there was no alternative to unquestioning faith in the government, unfaltering faith in the TV, abject obedience to every exhortation and decree. But in fact there always have been alternatives and still are. Those who refuse to consider them are choosing to refuse, of their free will. Those who tout, enact, support, obey lockdown strictures choose to do so of their free will. Nothing forces them.
 
The alternatives are: 1. To ask “How bad is this really? Let’s look at it soberly.” Anyone using common sense and reason, even if they hadn’t been previously familiar with the government-media’s unbroken record of lying, quickly would have detected a scam. Anyone who did some research would have found that Covid-19 is objectively a mild-to-moderate epidemic well within the normal range of the severity of flu epidemics, severe only for the narrow group of the aged who already are sick, just another variation on death from old age causing very little modification of their system’s pre-existing actuarial tables.
 
Anyone who chose this alternative quickly would have realized that the objective “danger”, such as it was, never justified any aggressive or onerous lockdown measure. It never justified anything we previously didn’t do for the flu.
 
2. If you reject doing (1), or even if hypothetically you did the questioning and research entailed in (1) and still thought the epidemic was severe, you still had the obligation to compare that to the inevitable evils of the lockdowns and make the decision, “However severe the epidemic is, it’s not worth casting away everything that makes us human, everything essential to living as human beings, and it’s not worth escalating the already horrific police state and accelerating the drive toward techno-totalitarianism, literally and truly a fate worse than death.”
 
(As throughout my adult life where I’ve always valued essential humanity and opposition to totalitarianism over any level of alleged danger, (2) was my default from day one of the propaganda, even before I began my research on what Covid really was and the detailed of the evils of the lockdowns. Then all my subsequent research confirmed that even without the valuations inherent in alternative (2), the facts of (1) would remain incontrovertible.)
 
So there’s two alternatives the policy-makers and the masses could have chosen and still can choose at will. They’ve never considered either for a second. Those who tout, enact, support, obey lockdown strictures do so of their free will. Nothing forces them. This can mean only they already held rationality and humanity in contempt. It can mean only they already wanted a totalitarian police state amid general economic destruction and self-destruction.
 
Their overall bad conscience and bad faith is easily discernable through their many canned lies and Orwellian modes of speaking. The core example, directly stemming from the political-cultural-psychological choice they made to exalt the fake danger of covid to the status of not just the supreme value but the only value while casting away all other values and discounting them to zero, is how they systematically speak in the lying way of attributing all their 100% artificial political and economic choices to the alleged act-of-god “covid”. Any restriction they mention, any drawback they admit, their preferred language runs “covid did this, covid did that…”
 
But in reality “covid” has done nothing. The gratuitously chosen lockdown measures have done everything. It’s not, “We can’t eat at our favorite restaurant because of covid”, it’s “We can’t because of the lockdown.” It’s not “We can’t go to the opera because of covid”, it’s “We can’t because of the lockdown and because the opera companies, for no reason at all, have chosen to liquidate themselves, in most or all cases permanently.” It’s not, “I can’t socialize, can’t meet new people as I used to, can’t date as I used to, because of covid”, it’s “I can’t because I’ve chosen for no reason at all to fear and loathe the physical existence of other human beings, and they’ve chosen for no reason to fear and loathe mine.”
 
If this lunacy were a unanimous choice among a group we could leave them to their misery. But the group is everyone, while we few who chose an alternative are simply being press-ganged into this anti-human horror.
 
But for the cultists, why such bad faith? Why the lack of self-confidence to affirm that at the TV’s command you chose a (vain) yearning for a sense of (false) security over humanity, over well-being, over freedom? Why do you blame your 100% free-willed actions on “covid”? Why won’t you affirm this defining project of your lives, the terror-lockdown assault and astroturfed mass death cult?
 
 
The motivations of the power elites in launching the assault are clear: Misdirect attention from economic collapse; perform a controlled demolition of the economy to avert a 2008-type chaotic collapse; set up a new escalated round of asset plunder; experiment with fascist top-down social control and bottom-up pressure for conformity; escalate the police state; suppress rising protest and populist movements; beat the anti-China war drums; perpetrate a Nazi-style mass euthanasia campaign against the aged and ill; radically escalate anti-human alienation and disintegration of all human community, all potential for human solidarity.
 
The technocratic priesthood supports all these goals and is financially dependent upon the corporate state. And then the lockdown assault offers them the opportunity for a radical acceleration of their techno-totalitarian agenda, everything from forced mass vaccination to greatly escalated surveillance to the use of the pretext to carry out a thorough Gleichschaltung of all technologies under the rubric of surveillance and control from afar. They’ve never made any secret of their satanic goal of turning all of civilization into the most omnipresent panopticon. Now they think this goal is in sight, with the “New Normal” and “Great Reset” afforded by the terror-lockdown assault providing the vehicle.
 
For the cultist masses, the covid propaganda has been a catalyst which mobilizes underlying mass-existential fear-itself over the near universal personal economic precarity and the universal ecological precarity of the economic civilization itself. Covid-related terrorist propaganda mobilized these immense vague fears toward this explosive reaction of desperate superstition and propitiatory rites which, it is hoped, if enough people participate, can somehow cause the real existential specter to pass over the house. The face diapers and hex distancing are the equivalent of lamb’s blood smeared over the door – pointless from any rational point of view, all-important from the point of view of the cult.
 
If the people continue on this path, and if the civilization can prop itself up enough longer, we’ll reach the system’s goal of a totalitarian surveillance and “tracing” system with physical TSA checkpoints everywhere and where each must submit to vaccination (no doubt coupled with scores of hundreds of other vaccines, once the system has you caught with forcing the first one), either de jure compulsory or technically “voluntary” but effectively mandatory if you want or are forced by socioeconomic circumstances to get or hold a job, drive a car, be part of any social group, receive medical care…To exist in any way other than as a total thrall to the technocratic corporate police state.
 
The parallel with 1930s Nazi policy toward the Jews is exact, except that there was no vaccine the Jews could take.
 
 
 
 
 

1 Comment

  1. Reblogged this on Citizens.

    Comment by con — November 21, 2020 @ 1:32 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this: