Volatility

May 23, 2009

Charade

There’s been loads of debate on what’s happening in America. Anywhere you can find expositions on capitalism and the end of capitalism or the death of capitalism or the reform of capitalism or how to save capitalism or the triumph of capitalism (this last one usually phrased in a different way). Also whether the putative reform of capitalism is actually socialism, and whether Americans are willing to entertain the term “socialism”, and from there of course to what terms like capitalism and socialism even mean anymore.
 
As to what terms we should use, it’s obvious that America has long been basically a corporatist system, meaning that here neither capitalism nor socialism are ideals, but are just tactics which are applied wherever appropriate to maximize the power and wealth of the nexus of big corporations and big government.
 
(The dream government for business would be something like the Franco regime. It was corporatist, economically “fascist”, with a state-supported religion (opium for the masses). But unlike Hitler or Mussolini Franco had a rational rather than a deranged foreign policy. (That’s why he resisted Hitler’s inducements to enter the war – Franco figured Hitler was cruising for a fall and would drag down everyone with him.)
 
So why has American business supported Bush-style hallucinatory imperialism and K-street thuggery? This shows the fundamental disconnect of all American life from reason and reality. In the twilight of cheap oil and exponential debt we have a void and a shoddy facade where an economy and a safety net should be, so that textbook “business” can no longer function, but only an ever more volatile disaster capitalism.)  
 
Capitalism, democracy, civics, citizenship, rule of law - all these mean nothing. They are nonexistent outside of propaganda pens (“schools”).
 
[I'd like to add here that if we want these things back, we can restore them, but not within the framework of big government, big corporations, the present system which is so terminally rotted, "bigness" itself, and not within the framework of the doomed fossil fuel civilization. We can only build new communities from the ground up. There can be a diversity of these, anything from smallholder capitalism to kibbutz communism, with the uniting principle being human community, as long as the other uniting principle is self-reliance and sustainability. If even the small relocalized communities get back into large-scale trade, specialization, "comparative advantage", and the inevitable expansion and conflict which must follow from these, then the whole nightmare begins again, only at a smaller level.]
 
Rather, the terms that capture reality are feudalism, corporatism, plutocracy, kleptocracy, lemon socialism, welfare fascism. What these capture is the utter irresponsibility, the sociopathy of American economic life.
 
No one is any longer trying to create, to invent, improve, add value, to make better their own or anybody else’s lives, to shine light on truth. Innovation and talent – using these in their English rather than their nowadays more common Orwellian sense - mean nothing.
 
Rather, everyone at every economic level is trying to get over, to run a scam, to ”get rich” (how tawdry and meanly nihilistic the “American dream” is at its core), to pose and not be, to say and not do. If they have the power they steal, spin, obscure, lobby, capture, bribe, obstruct, extort, and sue, to plunder, entrench, monopolize, rig the playing field in their favor, pull up the ladder behind them.
 
If they don’t have the power, they dream of these things.
 
How the banks and the FIRE sector have come to completely dominate the American system is a well-told story by now. I think anyone who is capable of understanding it must understand it by now. And now as Too Big To Fail zombies the big banks have only tightened their stranglehold over the economy and government, and over all measures of what constitutes economic good, bad, recovery, recession.
 
The other pivot of American life, economic, political, and psychological, is the “Global War on Terror”, which is the term encompassing the intensified imperial aggression America requires to secure the resources to prop up its fuel infrastructure, the corporatism which is directly enabled through the expanding military-industrial complex and is also the overarching system being propped up by this empire, and the increasingly constrictive “homeland” police state to repress the dissent all this must provoke.
 
My personal term for the GWOT and the neocon ideology it springs from is resource fascism. It centers on oil, but will soon center on “alternatives”: unconventional oil and agrofuels (we already have the ethanol pseudo-industry as a pure textbook example of a parasite). Here big corporations and mainstream environmentalists, conservatives and liberals, can join hands in trying to prop up cars and sprawl (the core material form of American life).
 
The unreality and the con extend everywhere. If the point of saving GM was to preserve good American jobs (or even just to maintain American military vehicle production, as some have argued), how is this served by letting them completely offshore to China? It’s not. Rather, “saving GM” is a particularly sloppy con job.
 
[I try not to bother tallying examples among small entities and non-rich, non-powerful individuals, since although there's plenty of corruption there as well, keeping our eyes on the prize means maintaining focus on the crimes of the powerful. It's these which construct and define the system. (The attempt among republicans to deflect this responsibility by blaming the small fry, so that the mortgage bubble and collapse were the fault of reckless borrowers exploiting the poor good-natured banks, and torture was the work of "bad apples", is an absurd fraud.) So if we wish to be educated and aware, defend ourselves and fight back, the first rule is to counter-attack something big and bloated.]
 
I wish I had a more rigorously optimistic way to wrap this up this morning. I wrote the first part of it, then did some work in the garden, and now I come back and think about how beautiful out it is. I believe the earth will still be able to heal once the oil wave recedes. As horrible as man’s vandalism has been, it’s still a surface wound.
 
What’s more questionable is whether the human soul can heal. When we look at the systematic ravages in ideology and religion, the perversion of education and despoliation of culture, the psychopathy of science and the apparently universal hatred for the mind, and when we ponder what horrors are likely to convulse the dying decades of the oil age, as the mad genius of oil tries to leave behind it an absolute scorched earth of the spirit once and for all, we must wonder what part of what’s human can be carried through the flames.
 
I don’t know yet what can be done and how to do it, but that’s what I see more and more people trying to figure out. At least this is the most promising sign.  

10 Comments »

  1. Stumbled on this blog through naked capitalism. Russ is definitely channeling Malthus. Gotta love his remarks on the nineteenth century–I completely agree that higher thought (philophy, art, music, literature) started to die horribly in 1914.

    One point on the horrible inevitability of American fascism can be drawn from a few simplified numbers, as follows. In ancient Athens, the rule of the Thirty was considered an oligarchy. Yet the ratio of rulers to ruled was only about 1:3,000. Everyone in Athens, even the slaves, personally knew at least one “oligarch” and his wife.

    The Framers (Madison) specified 1:30,000 for the first Congress, and managed to get the numbers just about right.

    In America at present, the ratio of rulers to ruled (and I use those terms advisedly) is now 1:650,000.

    Why bother to vote? Better to pick Congressmen by lot, as in Renaissance Venice or Florence.

    Comment by Phil — June 1, 2009 @ 10:05 pm

  2. Hi Phil, thanks for the comment. You’re right, modern mass societies, of whatever nominal political stripe (e.g. “democratic” vs. “autocratic”) are all really oligarchies. There’s simply no way a mass society can consistently empower anything but wealth and already-entrenched power. Size itself is the main evil and the common denominator.

    To give another example from ancient Greece, I think it was Aristotle who said somewhere that the maximum effective size for a truly democratic city-state was one where the voice of a herald in the city square could be heard throughout the city. Even if we don’t take that absolutely literally, it still gives a good approximation of the politically manageable size.

    I believe town-hall democracy can be a good form of government, or perhaps regional democracy if it was truly proportional and representative.

    But as for mass pseudo-democracy, I’m a complete skeptic. That’s never anything but a fig-leaf for plutocracy. Especially in America’s winner-take-all, anti-proportional system, which is set up with the intent of doing nothing but to always help entrench the status quo.

    Comment by Russ — June 2, 2009 @ 9:09 am

  3. Democracy can be pretty bad. Look at the Athenians’ flip-flop in deciding to exterminate the Milesians. And then, there was the Sicilian invasion: precisely analogous to our ill-considered second invasion of Iraq.

    A demonstrated understanding of Thucydides’ Peloponnesian War would be helpful in the wise exercise of political power.

    Now personally, I oppose democracy, preferring a constitutional republic where only tax-payers have the right to vote. That being said, I think the economic structure should permit everyone to earn enough money to pay taxes.

    There are just too many people. The great pandemics that are coming will solve a lot of problems. If we manage to fight them off, the world will be completely stripped, like a West Virginia mountain, in fifty years. Will anyone remember “Silent Running” when those times roll around?

    Comment by Phil — June 2, 2009 @ 12:37 pm

  4. Not that I want a pandemic, mind you–the idea is petrifying, and I would probably be one of the first to die–I simply mean that it would modulate the locust-like effect that existing human population levels are having on the ecosystem.

    Comment by Phil — June 2, 2009 @ 12:40 pm

  5. A demonstrated understanding of Thucydides’ Peloponnesian War would be helpful in the wise exercise of political power.

    If I had to pick one book on this subject to require, it would be that one. “The greatest book on politics, in the widest sense, that has ever been written”, is the judgement of the translator Rex Warner. I agree.

    I’d say Thucydides was the first “modern” writer, and the only one for the next 1900 years until Machiavelli, the second.

    Comment by Russ — June 2, 2009 @ 1:02 pm

  6. “Machiavelli and Guicciardini” by Felix Gilbert. Not to miss Guicciardini. Read his directly translated texts, preferably.

    First “modern” writer I give to Herodotus, beating Thucydides only by a year or two. Some would say the collected works of Hippocrates are the first really modern science, rejecting “divine causes” for illness. All, of course, coming within a few years of each other.

    Nothing compares to the scope of Thucydides’ talents. Not just the beauty of his oratory, which is unequaled in the Western tradition. The solidity of narrative structure, the wealth of detail, the attempt at objectivity despite his personal horrors: imagine the stature and character this man must have had in person. Gibbon, writing Decline and Fall 2200 years later, is just a dweeb by comparison.

    Much as I love Machiavelli, for real “contemporary modernity,” complete with the fundamental scepticism verging on nihilism that characterizes the most sophisticated moderns, I think you have to start from Voltaire.

    What kind of education do you have, Russ, that you know this stuff? Nobody knows this stuff anymore….

    Comment by Phil — June 2, 2009 @ 6:29 pm

  7. The reason I distinguish Herodotus is because in him history is still mingled with mythology and rumor, without the sense that these are or should be treated differently.

    While I agree Thucydides is both the greatest historian and one of the greatest, most profound writers in any genre, I wouldn’t disparage Gibbon, also one of my core writers, by comparison.

    I haven’t extensively read Voltaire, and only years ago. But, for all his rage against Christianity and Leibniz, wasn’t he in the end a deist who still believed in the watchmaker, and therefore implicitly in some cosmic “order”?

    Guicciardini I have never read, though I’ve heard great things about him. Whenever I read about the Renaissance I see he and Machiavelli ranged together.

    You are unfortunately right that nobody knows this stuff anymore. Nobody cares to know it. Besides, if you ever need a factoid, you can just google it, right?

    As for my own education, my formal education is just a BA in poli sci. College gave me a start, but just a start, in realizing what’s really important to know. For all the real stuff I’ve educated myself.

    Comment by Russ — June 3, 2009 @ 6:57 am

  8. Good points. I would only say this about that: there is some debate about the Enlightenment thinkers’ deism. It was even more dangerous to be a frank atheist then than now.

    Gibbon was a master, but I think in terms of actual writing, he loses his narrative dynamic to
    the accumulation of facts.

    Herodotus, in reporting rumor, often employed the following: “Many people say blah blah, but I myself have not seen it, and cannot vouch for its veracity.”

    Comment by Phil — June 3, 2009 @ 9:05 am

  9. Yes, I remember how he wrote that in India they were said to have ants the size of horses. :)

    Comment by Russ — June 4, 2009 @ 3:36 pm

  10. [...] Stimulus II RedState: Whoops… Entitlement Programs Collapsing Faster than Expected Volatility: Charade Frugal Café Blog Zone: Wealthy Democrat Supporters Dumbfounded… Realize Obama Will Take [...]

    Pingback by Obama’s Recession: Racial Gap Growing, No End in Sight — Unemployed NYC Blacks’ Numbers Increasing at Alarming Rate « Frugal Café Blog Zone — July 16, 2009 @ 3:56 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Theme: Silver is the New Black. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 114 other followers